While there is no information given as to when or where this video was taken, it still is an interesting piece of evidence related to the fake plane phenomena. As I have said before, most “fake plane” videos are easily explainable. However, this video, like the one filmed in Moscow that I posted a last month, is different. As you watch the plane fly across the sky, there appears to be something strange about the aircraft’s tail section.

Looking closely, it becomes apparent that the bulge is significantly larger than the rest of the fuselage. Additionally, it appears to be off center. Paying close attention to the shadows on the bulge it appears that all of it’s edges are rounded suggesting a elongated saucer like shape. What isn’t visible in the video, is whether or not the bulge is actually attached to or part of the plane.

With this limited information, I have two hypotheses that potentially explain what we are seeing in this video. The first is that the bulge is attached to the plane and that the plane is not really a plane, just camouflage being used to disguise the what ever the bulge actually is.

While there are planes that are capable of carrying cargo outside of the fuselage, the cargo is almost always mounted on top and centered over the wings. Mounting cargo under the tail section would be highly problematic both from an aerodynamic standpoint and because it would complicate takeoff and landing (if it didn’t make either outright impossible). This leaves us with the possibility that the wings and front fuselage are just window dressing to camouflage the true nature of the bulge, much like the allies did with tanks during the second World War. Now what the bulge actually is, that is anybody’s guess. It could be anything from a new aircraft design to a UFO.

My second hypothesis focuses on the bulge not being attached to the aircraft. In this case, I would posit a guess that the bulge is in fact a second craft of some type flying close to underside of the airplane to avoid detection by radar and observation from the ground. As with my first hypothesis, the bulge could be anything from a secret aircraft (though I doubt anyone would endanger two aircraft by flying so close when there are easier ways to hide the second craft) to a UFO whose technology allows it to easily compensate for the increased turbulence and movements of the airplane it is flying underneath.

It is also worth noting that some people have theorized that the bulge is just the result of jpeg compression causing a brightly colored tail section to appear larger than the more neutral fuselage. While, I have seen this effect in other videos, I have never seen it cause size to be exaggerated quite as much as would be required in this case. Additionally, this theory does not account for the shadows that indicate that the front of the bulge is also curved. Because of these points, I feel that this theory is unlikely, but as with all investigations into the unknown, it is important to be aware and open to ALL possible explanations.

Chemtrail tanker… What’s under the back?